HomePoliticsAyew Afriye accuses gov't of repackaging health policy, questions GH¢1.2bn allocation

Ayew Afriye accuses gov’t of repackaging health policy, questions GH¢1.2bn allocation

Date:

Related stories

Parliament confirms Francis-Xavier Sosu stable after GIMPA incident

Madina Member of Parliament, Francis-Xavier Sosu, is in stable...

‘It’s a gradual process’ — Adentan MP appeals for patience over road projects

The Member of Parliament for Adentan, Mohammed Adamu Ramadan,...

‘Cocaine Coast’ claims are mischievous – Majority Leader Agalga

Majority Leader in Parliament, James Agalga, has rejected claims...

PURC announces 0% adjustment for electricity, water tariffs

The Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) has maintained the...

Member of Parliament for Effiduase/Asokore, Nana Ayew Afriye, has criticised the government’s Free Primary Healthcare (FPHC) policy, alleging that it is largely a repackaged version of an existing initiative introduced under the previous administration.

The lawmaker has expressed concern over what he described as the “repackaging” of the New Patriotic Party’s (NPP) Free Annual Health Check programme into the current Free Primary Healthcare policy being implemented by the National Health Insurance Authority in collaboration with the Ghana Health Service.

According to him, the Free Annual Health Check initiative launched in August 2024 already provided preventive healthcare services such as blood pressure, blood sugar and Body Mass Index (BMI) screenings, alongside counselling and referrals for citizens aged 18 and above.

He argued that these same elements are prominently featured in the FPHC policy document without proper attribution to the original institutions and partners involved.

Afriye further claimed that the Ministry of Health failed to acknowledge key stakeholders, including the NHIA, the Ghana Health Service, the Christian Health Association of Ghana, private healthcare providers, as well as international partners like USAID and the World Bank, who contributed to the development and rollout of the earlier programme.

Citing portions of speeches delivered at the launch of the Free Annual Health Check initiative by former NHIA Chief Executive, Da-Costa Aboagye, the MP noted similarities between the objectives of that programme and those outlined in the new FPHC policy. Both, he said, emphasise early disease detection, reduced healthcare costs and improved quality of life through preventive care.

He also referenced remarks made on behalf of former Vice President Mahamudu Bawumia, which highlighted the programme’s focus on nationwide access to preventive services regardless of National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) enrolment status.

The Effiduase/Asokore MP argued that sections of the FPHC policy particularly those detailing screening services and community outreach mirror existing primary healthcare strategies long implemented by the Ghana Health Service, dating back to global frameworks such as the Alma-Ata Declaration.

He questioned whether the Ministry of Health had adequately reviewed existing primary healthcare systems before introducing the new policy, suggesting that some provisions appear to “reinvent the wheel” rather than address gaps in service delivery.

On financing, Afriye raised concerns about the reported GH¢1.2 billion annual allocation for the FPHC programme.

He contrasted this with funding for the earlier Free Annual Health Check initiative, which he said was supported by approximately $5 million from USAID and $8 million from the World Bank, alongside additional allocations from the NHIA.

Describing the current programme as “politically motivated,” the MP called for greater transparency and accountability in its implementation, insisting that further scrutiny would be necessary to establish its true value and impact.

By 1960news.com

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of 1960news.com