HomeNews"OSP: No acquital for Dr. Sledge in MIIF scandal"

“OSP: No acquital for Dr. Sledge in MIIF scandal”

Date:

Related stories

Parliament confirms Francis-Xavier Sosu stable after GIMPA incident

Madina Member of Parliament, Francis-Xavier Sosu, is in stable...

‘It’s a gradual process’ — Adentan MP appeals for patience over road projects

The Member of Parliament for Adentan, Mohammed Adamu Ramadan,...

‘Cocaine Coast’ claims are mischievous – Majority Leader Agalga

Majority Leader in Parliament, James Agalga, has rejected claims...

PURC announces 0% adjustment for electricity, water tariffs

The Public Utilities Regulatory Commission (PURC) has maintained the...

The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has issued a stern response to what it describes as “misleading and sensational” media headlines.

Contrary to reports suggesting a legal “clearance,” the OSP maintains that Nana Yaw Duodu (alias Dr. Sledge) of Goldridge Ghana Limited remains a central figure in an active criminal investigation.

​The OSP’s statement aims to correct the public record regarding the recent High Court ruling

The OSP clarified that it has not yet filed formal criminal charges against Dr. Sledge, therefore, no court has pronounced him “guilty” or “innocent.”

The probe focuses on the operations of the Minerals Income Investment Fund (MIIF) between 2020 and 2024.

The OSP revealed that the aspects of the investigation involving Dr. Sledge approximate a staggering USD 94 million.

​While the High Court recently refused to confirm the freezing of certain assets, the OSP asserts that the legal battle is far from over.

​”The assets remain frozen and are under the authority, protection, and preservation of the OSP in the public interest,” the Office stated.

​The OSP confirmed it has taken legal steps to nullify the court’s refusal and continues to “re-secure” the properties.

These assets include vehicles valued at GHC 18 million, which were initially frozen in 2025.

The OSP is currently conducting “tracing operations” to identify and freeze additional assets suspected to be tainted.

The Office concluded by assuring the public that any individual against whom sufficient evidence is established will be arraigned before a court of competent jurisdiction.

By 1969news.com

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of 1960news.com